Trusted, traceable learning

Microlearning you can audit.

One behaviour per module. Seven minutes by design. Every claim traceable to a verified source, and every module carrying its own assurance status. Built for organisations where "trust us" is not good enough.

  • 7 minutes by design
  • Source-traceable claims
  • Assurance graded

What you see is the surface

Any platform can produce a slick e-learning. What makes a module trustworthy is the framework underneath: where each claim comes from, who reviewed it, and how it stays current.

Iceberg diagram. Above the waterline, the visible formats: e-learning module, video, podcast, job aid, manager guide, and assessment. Below the waterline, the trust framework that produces them: objective-first design, a governed knowledge base, a source registry mapping every claim to a trusted source, human review by subject-matter experts, a visible assurance grade, and a review and regeneration cadence. To the right, four outcomes: trust, impact, efficiency, and sustainability.
The 7MM trust system. Tap to open full size.

Why seven minutes?

Not because attention is short, but because focus is precious. A module teaches exactly one decision routine, practises it, and stops.

Seven minutes by design

Every module fits a strict envelope: one objective, an active learner moment at least every ninety seconds, and a hard stop. The format is specified, measured, and enforced at review gates, not eyeballed.

🔗

Traceable to the source

Each claim in a module links back to a registered, validated source. No orphan facts, no "common knowledge". If a source expires or changes, the module is flagged for regeneration.

Assurance you can read

Modules carry a visible assurance grade backed by gate records: who reviewed what, when, and against which standard. The grade is computed from evidence, never self-declared.

Whitepapers

The thinking behind the system, in three papers. Free to download, no registration required.

7MM-001 · Whitepaper

Trusted Traceable Learning

Why organisational learning has a trust problem, and how source registries, claim extraction, and assurance grades solve it.

Download PDF

7MM-002 · Method paper

Seven Minutes By Design

The format itself: the seven-minute envelope, the active-learner cadence, and the evidence base for designing modules this way.

Download PDF

7MM-003 · System paper

The Living Knowledge Engine

How modules stay alive after publication: source revalidation, scheduled reviews, and regeneration instead of decay.

Download PDF

Explore a complete journey

The first module does not stand alone. It is one governed output inside the AI-Safe Municipality journey. See the module, then look underneath it at the sources, claims, reviews and assurance records that make it trustworthy.

KB-AIDATA-001 · Journey: AI-Safe Municipality · Dutch

AI-veilig werken met persoonsgegevens

A decision routine for municipal staff: three checks before using an AI tool with personal data. Three scenario decisions, one retrieval moment, one if-then plan. Approximately seven minutes.

Status: concept G6.2, internal proof. Not published guidance and not client-configured; placeholders are intentionally unfilled.

The assurance grade

The trust signal behind every output. A grade is computed from five trust pillars and backed by gate records; it degrades automatically when sources expire or reviews lapse.

AVerified
BReviewed
CLimited
DExpired
Concept overview of the 7MM assurance grade: trust pillars, grade scale, assurance registry, and verification flow.
Concept design of the assurance grade system (7MM-005b).